Now finally the greatest problem is the lack of rest. It’s likely to take you half the time from my experimental data and even then it’s not very much feasible, would be immensely difficult. If it takes you the same time, everytime, this is not going to be possible really without being 5-6x faster at everything mentioned. It’s possible you will meet the same card 5-6 times. Now the real problem is that you are going to need to re-answer the cards in a spaced repetition format. If however the front or back of the card is longer than a sentence you are going to need to work on either your reading and comprehension speed or the ability to retrieve information quickly enough, otherwise it wouldn’t really be feasible. ![]() It tends to take a lot of precise memorizing so you can retrieve something quicker than you can read it. ![]() If this retrieval is short, say less than a sentence in length too, in theory you could do it. The problem with answering is that you need to retrieve information. In short, 20 words in 6 seconds is feasible enough (200wpm), you can read at 400wpm to have 3 seconds to answer the question. The average length of a sentence can be 15-20 words. Given you are going to process the cards front, if it takes you longer than 6 seconds thats not going to work. I have learned around 1-2k cards in the same day a few times, but 10k is quite a bit.įor starters that(10k) is around 10 cards a minute for 17 hours.Ħ seconds a card. If you have a method to learn 10,000 flash cards in the same day.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |